收藏本站
收藏 | 投稿 | 手机打开
二维码
手机客户端打开本文

Comparison of two hemostasis methods after percutaneous coronary intervention

徐延敏  林小静  李广平  许纲  尹力  袁如玉  郑心田  陈新  
【摘要】:To assess the safety and efficacy of Boomerang closure wire compared with traditional man-made compression in patients underwent coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) .Meth-ods Three hundred and thirty-six cases who underwent transfemoral CAG or PCI were included in this study,221 ca-ses were treated with traditional compression of hemostasis,115 cases treated with Boomerang closure wire.The hemo-stasia time,immobilization time and relative vascular complications of the two groups were compared.Results There were obvious difference in the hemostasia time,immobilization time and the rate of the relative vascular complications (P 0.05) ,no patients experienced major complications in closure wire group,but one case experienced blood trans-fusion to retroperitoneal bleed in traditional man-made compression group.Conclusions closure wire is safe and effec-tive in patients undergoing CAG or PCI using the transfemoral approach,compared with tranditional man-made com-pression,closure wire can extremely decrease hemostasia time and immobilization time,there is a decreased trend in relative vascular complication,especially major complication.

知网文化
 快捷付款方式  订购知网充值卡  订购热线  帮助中心
  • 400-819-9993
  • 010-62982499
  • 010-62783978