| | | | | 《春秋》《左传》平议 | | | 王世舜 | | | 《史记》中有四处比较集中而详细的记载孔子作《春秋》一事，结合有关资料分析这些记载，不难看出在司马迁的心目中，孔子所作之《春秋》决不是《春秋经》而是《孔子史记》即《孔春秋》。左丘明为《春秋》作《传》一事，先秦并无记载，于史无据。乃汉儒主要是公羊家儒者傅会杜撰出来的，不可信从。《春秋考论》一书的考论是经得起检验的，其学术价值和贡献应该得到尊重和肯定，一味抹煞的态度是不可取的。
【作者单位】：聊城大学文学院 山东聊城
【关键词】：孔子史记;公羊家;孔予家语;谈诡之笔
【分类号】：K204
【DOI】：cnki:ISSN:1672-1217.0.2004-06-001
【正文快照】：
《左传》,按汉儒的说法是《春秋左氏传》的简称,其作者是与孔子同一时代的左丘明。传是对经的解释,《春秋左氏传》即左丘明对《春秋》这部经书的解释。《春秋》按孟子的说法为孔子所作。根据汉儒记载,解释《春秋》这部经书的,除《左传》之外还有《公羊氏》、《谷梁氏》、《邹氏》、《夹氏》四家。《汉书·艺文志》:“邹氏无师,夹氏未有书。”邹氏、夹氏因而失传。这样一来,解释《春秋》的传只剩下《左传》、《公羊传》、《谷梁传》三家,后代学者称之为《春秋))三传。 这里需要着重指出的是,在先秦只有关于《春秋》的记载,并无为《春秋》作传… | | |  推荐 CAJ下载  PDF下载 | | | CAJViewer7.0阅读器支持所有CNKI文件格式，AdobeReader仅支持PDF格式 | | | | A Comment on The Spring and Autumn Annals and Zuo Zhuan | | | WANG Shi - shun | | | The case that Confucius wrote The Spring and Autumn Annals was recorded in a way of stressing the main points and in detail in four sections of Records of the Grand Historian. It is not difficult to find out that to Si Ma- qian's mind The Spring and Autumn Annals written by Confucius is not The Original of the Spring and Autumn Annals , but the Confucius' Records of the Grand Historian, i.e. Confucius' Spring and Autumn Annals on condition that we analyze these records with the data concerned. The case of Zuo Qiu - ruing's commenting on The Spring and Autumn Annals can't be found in the records of the Pre - Qin era and have no grounds in the history. It was fabricated by the Confucians in Han Dynasty specially the Gong Yang School and so unbelievable. The textual criticism of The Textual Criticism of the Spring and Autumn Annals can withstand the examine. Its academic value and contribution should be respected and affirmed while the attitude of blindly obliterating them is unreliable.
【Keyword】：Confucius' Records of the Grand Historan;the Gong Yang School;Confucius' Dialogue in House;the style of humour and mystery |
|
|
