| | | | | 论战后日本首相吉田茂的亚太经济政策 | | | 孙启军;张英姣 | | | 二战期间,以武力建立“大东亚共荣圈”把日本引向不归路,惨败的日本战后在保守派首相吉田茂的率领下,自主选择了“日美基轴和经济外交”战略,在亚太经济政策上主张:追随和依靠美国,以美日同盟为基轴,复兴日本经济;以“战争赔偿”重新进入东南亚市场;服从美国冷战战略,对中国实行“政经分离”原则,维持以贸易为主的事实上的关系。吉田茂的亚太经济政策为日本经济在战后十年的迅速恢复和发展提供了基础,但过分依赖美国,使日本不得不面对“半独立”、“半媾和”等日美关系问题,也延缓了对苏、中、东南亚政策问题解决的步伐。
【作者单位】：聊城大学政法学院 山东聊城252059
【关键词】：吉田茂;日美基轴;战争赔偿;政经分离
【分类号】：K313.5
【DOI】：CNKI:ISSN:1671-9743.0.2007-03-021
【正文快照】：
二战结束时,日本经济已处于崩溃的边缘,生产萎缩、通货膨胀严重、粮食和物资奇缺,内政外交处于美军占领当局的控制之下,如何恢复和发展经济成为摆在日本当政者面前的头等大事。吉田茂(1878—1967)是日本现代著名的政治家、外交家,在1945—1955年日本经济恢复和重建的十年间,他先后五次组阁,担任首相达七年之久。战后初期日本实行的亚太(亚太范围指东南亚、东北亚、北美洲以及大洋洲)经济政策基本上是在他执政时期确立的,吉田茂的亚太经济政策是吉田路线的重要组成部分,在日本战后经济发展史上占有重要地位。一、日美基轴———政策的核心和… | | |  推荐 CAJ下载  PDF下载 | | | CAJViewer7.0阅读器支持所有CNKI文件格式，AdobeReader仅支持PDF格式 | | | | A Brief Discussion of Japanese Premier Yoshida's Asia-Pacific Economic Policy after World War Ⅱ | | | SUN Qi-jun;ZHANG Ying-jiao(Politics and Law School;Liaocheng University;Liaocheng;Shandong 252059) | | | During the World War II,the strategy of building“Greater Easter Asia Co-prosperity Sphere”by military forces led Japan to desperation.After the disastrous defeat,Japan chose the“Japan-US Basic Axle”and“Economy Diplomacy”strategies under the leadership of conservative Premier Yoshida.In view of the Asia-Pacific economic policies,they advocated:following and relying on the United States,reviving Japan's economy based on the“Japan-US alliance”;reentering the Southeast Asia marketplace by way of war reparations;obeying US cold war policy,implementing the principle of“separating politics and economy”,and maintaining the de facto trade relationship with China.Yoshida's Asia-Pacific economic policies established a solid foundation for the rejuvenation and development of Japan's economy in the ten years' period of postwar.However,due to excessive dependence on the US,Japan not only had to face the situation of“half-dependence”and“half peace-making”,but also delayed solving the problems with Soviet Union,China and Southeast Asia.
【Keyword】：Yoshida;Japan-US Basic Axle;war reparations;separating politics and economy |
|
|
