| | | | | 《古“登”字有凭义——兼谈“登轼而望之”》商榷 | | | 汪少华 | | | 《古“登”字有凭义——兼谈“登轼而望之”》认为:古“冯”有登义。由词义渗透律的制约,因“冯(憑)”有登乘之登义,所以“登”也有凭依之凭义。《左传·庄公十年》“登轼而望之”即“凭轼而望之”。本文认为“登”有无凭义,关键在于证据是否充分。然而其证据皆不能令人信服,本文逐一商榷,认为“古‘登’有凭义”难以成立,“登轼而望之”之“登轼”亦非凭轼。
【作者单位】：杭州师范学院语言研究所 浙江杭州310036北京师范大学文学院;北京100875
【关键词】：登;凭;登陴;登木;登轼
【分类号】：H131.1
【DOI】：cnki:ISSN:1001-5442.0.2006-03-018
【正文快照】：
《古“登”字有凭义—兼谈“登轼而望之”》(((中国语文》1997年第4期，以下简称《登》文)认为:古“冯”有登义。由词义渗透律的制约，因“冯”(遇)有登乘之登义，所以“登”也有凭依之凭义。《左传·庄公十年》“登轼而望之眼p“凭轼而望之”。的确，古“冯”有登义。但是，词义渗透并不是无往不适的规律和公式，“登”有无凭依之凭义，关键在于证据是否充分。相比于旧注、成说，《登》文缺乏说服力。例如《左传·哀公十六年》:“子伯季子初为孔氏臣，新登于公。”杜预注:“升为大夫。”杨伯峻注:“据杨树达先生《读(左传>》，‘登’即《论… | | |  推荐 CAJ下载  PDF下载 | | | CAJViewer7.0阅读器支持所有CNKI文件格式，AdobeReader仅支持PDF格式 | | | | A Discussion About "Deng"(登) Had the Meaning of "Lean on" in Ancientry--Giving Attention to "Deng Shi Er Wang Zhi"(登轼而望之) | | | WANG Shao-hua (Chinese Department;Hangzhou Normal University;Hangzhou 310036;China) | | | This is one point of view in the article of Deng(登) Had the Meaning of "Lean on" in Ancientry--Giving Attention to Deng Shi Er Wang Zhi(登轼而望之) that Ping(凭) had the meaning of mounting in ancientry, Deng(登) had the meaning of "Leaning on" because of the infiltration of acceptation. Deng Shi Er Wang Zhi (登轼而望之) is equal to Ping Shi Er Wang Zhi (凭轼而望之). But we consider that the evidence in the article is beyond belief. It is difficult to make certain that Deng(登) had the meaning of "Leaning on" in ancientry. And Deng Shi(登轼) is not equal to Ping Shi (凭轼).
【Keyword】：mount;lean on;Deng Bi(登陴);Deng Shi (登轼);Deng Mu(登木) |
|
|
