| | | | | 吴语的句法类型特点 | | | 刘丹青 | | | 本文根据12个吴方言点的调查材料,揭示吴语的两大句法类型特点。一、吴语是比北京话更不典型的SVO类型和比北京话更典型的话题优先类型。吴语的静态句(惯常行为句、嵌入句等)一般只用SVO型,但其他情况下常由受事充当话题(特别是主语后动词前的次话题),形成STV或TSV。在是非疑问句、否定句中话题句更占明显优势。这种趋势在浙江沿海吴语中尤为突出,其进一步发展有可能导致STV向SOV的历史演变,只是目前尚未到此阶段。二。吴语像北京话一样前置词和后置词并存,但后置词比北京话更为发达,表现在语法比程度更高、在句法结构中的作用更重要。这与吴语正在接近动词居末类型的事实是相和谐的。
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院语言研究所 北京
【关键词】：吴语;句法类型;语序;前置词;后置词
【分类号】：H17
【DOI】：cnki:ISSN:0257-0203.0.2001-04-005
【正文快照】：
壹 引言:从方言语法研究的参照系谈起 汉语方言的句法研究,惯常拿北京话或北京话的研究成果当参照。这样可以较快地揭示出方言中明显区别于共同语的特点:不过,这种做法也有些局限。首先,其前提是对北京话句法已经有清楚的认识.可是我们并非对北京话语法的方方面面都已了解清楚, | | | | | |  推荐 下载CAJ全文  下载PDF全文 | | | CAJViewer7.0阅读器支持所有CNKI文件格式，AdobeReader仅支持PDF格式 | | | | Two Major Typological Features of Wu Dialects | | | Liu Danqing | | | Based on fieldwork materials of 12 Wu dialects, this paper shows two major typological features of Wu dialects. Firstly, Wu dialects are even less typical than Mandarin as SVO-type, but are more typical than it as topic-prominent type. In static clauses (sentences telling of habits, embedded clauses, etc.) SVO order is dominant, but in other cases, the patient often occurs as topic, typically as sub-topic located between subject and the verb, resulting in the STV or TSV pattern. Topicalization is predominant in polarity questions and negative clauses. This tendency is stronger in coastal dialects of Zhejiang province. A further development of this situation might lead to a typological shift from STV to SOV. So far, however, no single dialect of Wu has completed such a shift. Secondly, Wu dialects, like Mandarin, are of both prepositions and postpositions, but their postposition system is more advanced than that of Mandarin in that there are richer highly grammaticalized postpositions which play more active syntactic roles in Wu dialects than in Mandarin. This feature is in accordance with the fact that Wu dialects are approaching to a verb-final type.
【Keyword】：Wu dialects, syntactic type, word order, prepositions, postpositions |
| | | | | | 1 | 赵学玲; 章丘方言的体貌系统 [A];语海新探（第五辑）——信息网络时代中日韩语文现代化国际学术研讨会论文集 [C]; 2002年 | | 2 | 朱晨曦; 汉语南北方言词缀的比较 [A];语海新探（第五辑）——信息网络时代中日韩语文现代化国际学术研讨会论文集 [C]; 2002年 |
|
| | | | | | 1 | William Croft; Typology and Universals[M] [M];; 2000年 | | 2 | Li, Charles N, and Sandra A. Thompson; Mandarin Chinese: A functiona lreference grammar [M];; 1981年 | | 3 | Büring D; Let’s Phrase It.Focus,Word Order,and Prosodic Phrasing in German Double Object Constructions [M];Competitionin Syntax(Studies in Generative Grammar49); 2001年 | | 4 | Cowan MM; TzotzilGrammar,Summer Institute of Linguistics Publications in Linguistics and Related Fields,18 [M];; 1969年 | | 5 | Edward LK; Remarkable Subjects in Malagasy [M];Subject and Topic; 1976年 | | 6 | Graham,&Barry; Topicalization hierarchies:1,2,>3>human>ani mate>inani mate. [M];; 1981年 | | 7 | Li N,&Thompson SA; Subject and Topic:A Newtypology of Language, [M];Subject and Topic; 1976年 | | 8 | Mallinson G,&Blake JB; Language Typology:Cross-Linguistic Studies in Syntax [M];North-Holland Linguistic Series; 1981年 | | 9 | Matthews S,&Yip V; Cantonese:A Comprehensive Grammar Routledge11newfetter lane London EC4P,4EE [M];; 1994年 | | 10 | Keenan EL; The Syntax of Subject-Final Languagein Syntactic Typology [M];Studiesinthe Phe-nomenology of Language; 1978年 |
|
|
|