| | | | | 先秦儒道美学思想中的“和谐”观比较 | | | 耿爱先 | | | 先秦儒道两家都视和谐为天地自然之根本,但在和谐的本源问题和解决这个问题的目的、方式上则有所不同。概括来讲一个主张"天行有常",一个坚持认为应"道法自然";一个强调"和而不同",一个坚持"知和曰常"。
【作者单位】：佛山科学技术学院社会科学教学部 广东佛山528000
【关键词】：天行有常;道法自然;和而不同;知和曰常;致中和;吾丧我
【分类号】：B83-092
【DOI】：cnki:ISSN:1008-018X.0.2004-06-005
【正文快照】：
今天我们所说的“和谐”,在先秦,即春秋战国时期儒道美学思想中,大多是以“和”、“中”、“中和”、“美”、“道”、“天人合一”、“物我同一”等概念来表述的。儒道两家都以“和谐”为旨归,并且以“和谐”为最美。不过在“和谐”的本源意义、“和谐”的构成与存在状态、以及达到“和谐”的路径或方法等许多具体问题上,两者又表现出很大的差异,这种差异既表现出儒道的相同、相通之处,也表现出二者的对立和矛盾。一、“天行有常”与“道法自然”如果说在春秋战国时期,随着理性精神的滥觞,人们就将和谐视为天地自然之根本的话,那么儒道… | | |  推荐 CAJ下载  PDF下载 | | | CAJViewer7.0阅读器支持所有CNKI文件格式，AdobeReader仅支持PDF格式 | | | | A Comparison of Views on Harmony in the Aesthetic Thought of Confucianism and Taoism in the Pre-Qin Dynasty | | | GENG Ai-xian(Faculty of Social Sciences;Foshan University;Foshan 528000;China) | | | The Confucianism and Taoism in the Pre-Qin dynasty both regarded Harmorry as the foundation of nature, but held different views on the purpose and means in dealing with the origin of harmony. Generally speaking, the former advocated "the nature has its law", the later stood for "the law regulates the nature",the former emphasized on "harmonious but not united", the latter insisted on "understanding and harmony is eternality".
【Keyword】：the nature has its law;the law regulates the nature;harmonious but not united;understanding and harmony is eternality |
|
|
