| | | | | 逻辑与历史的不平衡和统一性的对比研究——孙绍振研究兼与苏珊·朗格《情感与形式》比较 | | | 吴励生;叶勤 | | | 本文的研究聚集于孙绍振的新著《文学性讲演录》,着重分析其对情感逻辑、文学形式规范等问题的研究,并将之与苏珊.朗格的形式主义美学进行了细致深入的比较。虽然苏珊.朗格对艺术形式的研究达到了相当的高度与力度,但也因其形而上特质而流于空疏,而孙绍振恰恰在她无法深入之处,以其罕见的经验归纳与理论抽象能力,将原本形而上的概念与规律予以深化、细化、具体化与可操作化。而这种分区,所体现的乃是二者各自基于不同的学术传统所做的继承与超越,以及出于不同的理论目的与兴趣所进行的理论建构。
【作者单位】：中国政法大学法学院 北京100088(吴励生);福建师范大学传播学院 福建福州350108(叶勤)
【关键词】：《文学性讲演录》;《情感与形式》;情感逻辑;艺术形式
【分类号】：I0
【DOI】：CNKI:SUN:FJSX.0.2008-01-020
【正文快照】：
毋庸置疑,孙绍振是文学研究领域的逻辑主义者:在理论家普遍认为无逻辑可言的情感领域、审美领域、艺术创造领域,他却能够条分缕析出情感的逻辑、体系化的文体形式规范、作家心理的智能结构与非智能结构等科学主义的概念和观点。但仅仅用“逻辑主义”来给他贴标签是远远不够的,更准确地说,他是文学研究领域的理性主义者,不仅追求逻辑的理性,而且追求历史的理性。表现在文学审美规范研究中,他所做的不仅是逻辑的展开,而且在历史的语境和经验积累中展开,也即讲求逻辑与历史的不平衡和统一性的对比研究,从而更准确有效地论证文学的内在逻辑发展… | | |  推荐 CAJ下载  PDF下载 | | | CAJViewer7.0阅读器支持所有CNKI文件格式，AdobeReader仅支持PDF格式 | | | | A Study on Sun Shaozhen's Theory: the Imbalance and the Unity of Logic and History——Comparing with Susan Langer's Feeling and Forms | | | WU Li-sheng1;YE Qin2(1.Law School of Chinese Political & law University;Beijing 100088;China;2.Communication School of Fujian Normal University;Fuzhou 350108;China) | | | This paper focuses on Sun Shaozhen's new works A Lecture on Literariness,deeply analyzes Sun's study on the logic of feeling and the literary formal principles,and compares it with Susan Langer's formalist aesthetics in detail. As a conclusion,we consider that Langer's study on art forms achieves a considerable height and strength,but it is a little empty because of its metaphysical character,while Sun deepens,particularizes,reifys and operationalizes the metaphysical concepts and principles which Langer cannot discuss deeply with his unusual abilities of induction and abstraction.The difference between Sun and Langer shows they both inherit and exceed each academic tradition,and construct their own theory proceeding from each theoretical aim and interest.
【Keyword】：A Lecture on Literariness,Feeling and Forms,the logic of feeling,art forms |
|
|
