| | | | | 语用标记语和语义/语用界面 | | | 冯光武 | | | 语用与语义的纠葛从语用学诞生的那天就开始了。语义研究和语用研究的划分纷繁复杂,但归纳起来大致有:(i)它们是语言研究的不同分相,彼此独立、又相互补充;(ii)语用学是语义学的“废纸篓”,处理语义学不能处理的意义问题;(iii)语义研究的对象是语言形式,语用研究的对象是语言使用,两者互有交叉;(iv)语义研究关照句子意义、真值条件意义、命题意义和脱离语境的意义,语用研究关照说话人意义、非命题意义和具体语境中的意义。本文从语言哲学有关意义的理论说起,简要介绍众说纷纭的语义/语用界面理论,再用话语中常见的语言现象—语用标记语—来说明我们很难将语义研究和语用研究进行截然分割,最后指出语法化理论能给语义/语用界面研究带来启示。
【作者单位】：广东外语外贸大学 广州510420
【关键词】：意义;语义/语用界面;语用标记语;语法化
【分类号】：H030
【DOI】：cnki:ISSN:1000-0100.0.2005-03-000
【正文快照】：
1引言受符号学三分法的影响,现代语言学理论通常将语言研究划分为句法、语义和语用研究三个分相。它们代表三种不同的语言知识:语言符号之间关系的知识、语言符号与其所指之间关系的知识以及语言符号与其使用者之间关系的知识(Morris1938:6—7)。三种知识互为补充,有各自的研究 | | |
| | |  推荐 下载CAJ全文  下载PDF全文 | | | CAJViewer7.0阅读器支持所有CNKI文件格式，AdobeReader仅支持PDF格式 | | | | Pragmatic Markers and Semantics/Pragmatics Interface | | | Feng Guangwu | | | The boundary between semantics and pragmatics has been the concern of philosophers and linguists since the birth of pragmatics as a discipline of linguistic theory. Traditionally, the borderline is drawn between truth-conditional and non-truth-conditional phenomena, linguistic meaning and use, conventional and non-conventional meaning, contextual meaning and meaning independent of context. This paper introduces and comments on the various theories and refutes the assumption that the distinctions are clear-cut by using a class of borderline phenomena, called pragmatic markers. We suggest that their problematic status is closely connected with the grammaticalization process they are involved in. And the theory of grammaticalization may shed light on the issue of semantics/pragmatics interface.
【Keyword】：meaning;semantics/pragmatics interface;pragmatic markers;grammaticalization |
|
|