| | | | | 中国潜在产出与产出缺口的估算 | | | 郭庆旺,贾俊雪 | | | 本文在分析比较了潜在产出的三种估算方法的基础上 ,估算出我国1 978— 2 0 0 2年间的潜在产出、产出缺口和潜在增长率。结果表明 :(1 ) 1 978— 2 0 0 2年间我国的产出缺口出现了波动水平正负交替的古典周期情形 ;(2 ) 1 995年以前 ,产出缺口波动比较剧烈而且频繁 ,1 996年特别是 1 999年以后 ,产出缺口变化较为平缓 ;(3 )从 1 999年开始 ,我国产出缺口扩大的势头明显趋缓 ,但在 2 0 0 2年出现了一些反转迹象 ,这表明 1 998年开始实施的积极财政政策在遏制经济下滑、治理经济衰退方面起到了重要作用 ;(4)根据以消除趋势法和生产函数法估算的潜在产出 ,我们可以推断 1 978— 2 0 0 2年间的平均潜在产出增长率
【作者单位】：中国人民大学中国财政金融政策研究中心 100872
(郭庆旺);中国人民大学中国财政金融政策研究中心 100872(贾俊雪)
【关键词】：潜在产出;产出缺口;消除趋势法;增长率推算法;生产函数法
【分类号】：F015
【DOI】：cnki:ISSN:0577-9154.0.2004-05-003
【正文快照】：
一、引 言潜在产出和产出缺口是宏观经济学的重要概念,也是分析宏观经济运行态势的重要工具,尤其是政府制定宏观经济政策的重要依据。首先,在中期,估算潜在产出和产出缺口,有助于决策者确认可持续实际经济增长的空间;在短期,估算产出缺口可以评估通货膨胀压力。其次,估算潜在 | | |  推荐 CAJ下载  PDF下载 | | | CAJViewer7.0阅读器支持所有CNKI文件格式，AdobeReader仅支持PDF格式 | | | | Estimating Potential Output and the Output Gap in China | | | Guo Qingwang & Jia Junxue (China Financial Policy Research Center;Renmin University of China) | | | After comparing the three methods of estimating potential output, the paper estimates potential output, output gap and potential growth rate for the period from 1978 to 2002 in China. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) The output gap presented classical business cycle character from 1978 to 2002. (2) The output gap fluctuated markedly and frequently before 1995, but more smoothly after 1996 especially after 1999. (3) The increasing trend of output gap obviously changed smoothly and presented some appearances of turnover in 2002, which suggested the active fiscal policy which had been implemented from 1998 had significant effects on preventing economy from slowdown and depression. (4)For the period from 1978 to 2002 by using the detrending method and the production method respectively,we can concluded that average potential growth rate.
【Keyword】：Potential Output;Output Gap;Detrending Method;Growth Rate Extrapolation Method;Production Function Method |
| | | | | | 1 | Diebold,F.X.,and Rudebusch,G.D; A Nonparamet-ric Investigation of Duration Dependence in the Ameri-can Business Cycle[J] [M];Journal of Political Economy; 1990年 | | 2 | Sichel,D.E; Business Cycle Duration Dependence:AParametric Approach[J] [M];The Review of Econimicsand Statistics; 1991年 | | 3 | Guilmi,Corrado Di,,Gaffeo,Edoardo ,and Gallegati,Mauro; Empirical results on the size distribution ofbusiness cycle phases[J] [M];Physica; 2004年 | | 4 | Filardo,A.J; Business Cycle Phases and Their Transi-tional Dynamics[J] [M];Journal of Business& Economic Statistics; 1994年 | | 5 | Ghysels,E; On the Periodic Structure of the BusinessCycle[J] [M];Journal of Business&Economic Statistics; 1994年 | | 6 | Sichel,D.E; Inventories and the Three Phases of theBusiness Cycle[J] [M];Journal of Business& Economic Statistics; 1994年 | | 7 | Kavi Gounder,Steven Morling; Measures of PotentialOutput in FiJi[P] [M];; 06,October 2000年 | | 8 | Coe and Helpman; International R&D Spillovers [M];European Economic Review39; 1995年 | | 9 | Baxter,M.,and King,R.; Measuring Business Cycles:Approximate Band-pass Filters for Economic Series[Z]. [M];NBERWorking Paper,No 5022; 1999年 | | 10 | Charles R N, Stephen B; A new approach to decomposition of economic time series into permanent and transitory components with particular attention to measurement of the business cycle [M];; 1981年 |
|
|
|
