| | | | | 构式义、转喻与句式压制 | | | 李勇忠 | | | 构式语法认为 ,语言的意义是由词汇义和语法构式相互作用生成的 ,构式义和词汇义之间表现为要么一致要么冲突的关系。两者一致时 ,语义合格 ,两者冲突时 ,则通过压制 ,要么生成合格语句 ,要么生成不合格句。本文从转喻认知原理出发 ,探讨了构式义与词汇义相互压制所应遵循的认知规律。
【作者单位】：江西师范大学外语学院 江西南昌330027
【关键词】：构式语法;概念转喻;构式义;词汇义;压制
【分类号】：H05
【DOI】：cnki:ISSN:1002-722X.0.2004-02-002
【正文快照】：
0 .引言传统上 ,语法研究往往从自下而上的路向来研究句子的意义。(沈家煊 ,2 0 0 0 ) 配价语法是个典型的例子 ,它认为句子的合格性在于动词的配价情况。这种研究路向的基本假设是 ,整个句子的合格性是由其各组成成分 (动词和相关的名词等 )决定的 ,动词是核心成分 ,句子的合 | | |
| | |  推荐 下载CAJ全文  下载PDF全文 | | | CAJViewer7.0阅读器支持所有CNKI文件格式，AdobeReader仅支持PDF格式 | | | | Metonymy and Construction Coercion | | | LI Yong-zhong (Foreign Languages College of Jiangxi Normal University;Nanchang;Jiangxi Prov.;330027;China) | | | According to Construction Grammar,the overall sentence meaning results from the interplay between constructional and lexical meanings. These meanings may either be compatible or conflict with each other. When compatible,they reinforce each other. In the case of meaning conflict,there are two possible outcomes: the sentence may be conceptually anomalous or the conflict may be resolved by one meaning coercing the other. From the perspective of metonymic principles,this paper analyzes the cognitive rules by which the coercion between constructional and lexical meanings follows.
【Keyword】：construction grammar;conceptual metonymy;constructional meaning;lexical meaning;coercion |
| | | | | | 1 | Gibbs,R; Embodied experience and linguistic meaning [M];Brain andLanguage; 2003年 | | 2 | Goldberg,A; Constructions:A Construction Grammar Approach to Argu-ment Structure [M];; 1995年 | | 3 | Goldberg,A; The relationships between verbs and constructions[A] [M];Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Con-struction of Meaning[C]; 1997年 | | 4 | Iwata,S; The role of verb meaning in locative alternations[A] [M];Grammatical Constructions:Back to the roots[C].; 2005年 | | 5 | Johnson,M; The Body in the Mind:The Bodily Basis ofMeaning,Imagi-nation,and Reason [M];; 1987年 | | 6 | Lakoff,G; Women,Fire,and Dangerous Things:What Categories Revealabout the Mind [M];; 1987年 | | 7 | Lamb,S; Learning syntax—a neurocognitive approach[A] [M];Applied Cognitive Linguistics I:Theory and Language Acquisition[C].; 2001年 | | 8 | Langacker,R; Foundations of Cognitive Grammar(Vol.1)[M]. [M];; 1987年 | | 9 | Langacker,R; Integration,grammaticization,and constructional meaning[A] [M];Grammatical Constructions:Back to the Roots[C].; 2005年 | | 10 | Leek,F; Rigid syntax and flexible meaning:The case of the English di-transitive[A] [M];Conceptual Structures,Dis-course,and Language[C].; 1996年 |
|
|
|