| | | | | 民事责任竞合立法的缺陷及修补——对合同法第122条规定的检讨 | | | 赵许明 | | | 合同法第122条关于违约责任与侵权责任竞合,允许受害方有依法要求加害人承担违约责任或侵权责任的“择一请求”权,匡正了司法实践中长期不允许受害方从中选择的习惯做法,有利于保护受害方的合法权益。但实践证明,该条在某些场合下,不能填补受害方的最低损失,有明显缺陷,新的民法典草案不应当原文照搬。
【作者单位】：华侨大学法律系 福建
【关键词】：合同法;责任竞合;缺陷;修补
【分类号】：D923.6
【DOI】：cnki:ISSN:1006-1398.0.2003-03-009
【正文快照】：
最近,全国人大法工委的“民法典草案”讨论稿第一编第六章第95条原封不动地采用了合同法第122条的规定:“合同当事人一方的违约行为,侵害对方人身、财产权益的,受损害方有权选择依照本法要求其承担违约责任或者依照其他法律要求其承担侵权责任。”依文释义,受害方只能任择其一:或提起违约请求,或提起侵权请求,不得同时行使两个请求权(以下简称“择一请求”)。该条允许受害人“择一请求”,是我国民事立法的重大突破,也是“世界各国的合同立法中少见的”川。然而,在上述情况下,可以有两种情况:有时只能“择一请求”,有时则可“一并请求”。该… | | |  推荐 CAJ下载  PDF下载 | | | CAJViewer7.0阅读器支持所有CNKI文件格式，AdobeReader仅支持PDF格式 | | | | Flaws and Amendment of Legislation on Concurrent Liabilities——Examine the Provision of Article 122 in Contract Law | | | ZHAO Xu-ming
(Dept. of law;Huaqiao Univ.;362011;Quanzhou;China) | | | With regard to the concurrent liabiity for breach of contract and liability for infringement, the provision of article 122 in contract law allows the injured party to have the right of requesting the injuring party to be responsible for breach or infringement when these two contend with each other. This provision allows the victim to choose between the two, it rectifies the customary way which allows the victim no right of choices. This provision ought to be favourable in protectiing lawful rights and interests of victim whereas it cannot compensate for the lowest loss of victim in some cases, as proved by practices. This article has obvious flaws. The new civil law draft should not indiscriminately copy it.
【Keyword】：contract law;concurrent liabilities;flaws and amendment |
|
|
