| | | | | 二语习得实证研究评估方法 | | | 吴旭东 | | | 在二语习得研究中,对前人的实证性研究进行深入客观地评估是确保研究质量的重要前提,但也是一项十分困难的任务,不论是对初涉研究的新手,还是对经验丰富的研究者来说,都是如此。本文首先通过分析实证研究的主要阶段以及每个阶段的主要特点,提出了以下观点:研究课题具体化的过程实际上是为研究类型定位的过程,研究类型一旦确定,就可以根据其性质对研究各组成部分及其之间关系的特点做出明确的预测,并据此对代表研究质量的各项重要指标,如理论框架、设计方案、调查工具、调查步骤、数据分析方法等,进行评估,进而对总体研究质量做出判断。接着,在分析社会科学对实证研究分类的基础上,提出了二语习得研究的分类,并介绍每种类型研究的特点。最后,本文探讨了二语习得研究过程中各阶段之间存在的关系,以及根据这些关系来评价研究质量的原则。
【作者单位】：广东外语外贸大学语言学及应用语言学研究中心 510420
【关键词】：实证研究;质量评估;二语习得
【分类号】：H09
【DOI】：cnki:ISSN:1003-6105.0.2002-01-008
【正文快照】：
义献阅过足科研过仆中个。。顺缺的 个小骤。f＊呵卜“,啊＊呐何纤驰 山小收入视仙人的利I人研9“卜比炉计,从冬什始HL的研＃乙从功能卜石,文献阅汝介科研过肿I。起J川z卜J.:卜山们川。悦它爪卜,x卜为它X研穴存发现科研队地的下公进什上,山枕X说,通过厂纳分析仙人的研丸成双,研穴肾。似发现研七颂域中尚什淋次的问越;说亡川卜,丛山为亡计仆为研穴K烊OV卜沦卜、川穴八沧卜或仙穴卜只设计力仰的依批,山机悦,汕穴片介以D:川＊人沦足业个说垠受他人沙X川尘人所创新圳离小〕N忡人义献的沈入分A卜八＊九 卜此,对义献的门 分析‘卅价足整个讪… | | |  推荐 CAJ下载  PDF下载 | | | CAJViewer7.0阅读器支持所有CNKI文件格式，AdobeReader仅支持PDF格式 | | | | CA Framework for Evaluating Empirical Research in Second Language Acquisition | | | WU Xu-dong | | | To ensure high quality in one's research in second language acquisition, maintaining objectivity in evaluating the empirical studies conducted by previous researchers is one of the most important preconditions. However, it is also a daunting task, not only for novice researchers, but for experienced ones as well. Based on an in-depth analysis of the main stages that empirical research involves in, it is argued that the process of concretizing the general research topic is actually one of determining the research type, which, in turn, provides the basis on which the components of research and their interrelationships can be predicted. These predictions will then enable the evaluator to further assess the important indicators of the research quality, such as theoretical framework, research design, research instrument, data collection procedures and data analysis techniques. Finally, the assessment will serve as the basis on which the overall quality of the research can be judged. Using the classification of research types proposed in the works of social science (e.g., Babbie, 1998) as the basis, the author establishes a framework for evaluating empirical research in second language acquisition. The framework distinguishes three major types of empirical studies in terms of research purpose: exploratory, descriptive and explanatory. Each type of research has its own unique design, data collection procedures and data analysis techniques. The ways in which the findings are interpreted are also different in essence. Guided by the close interrelationships of the components as identified and described in the framework, the paper discusses the principles governing the evaluation of the three types of SLA research.
【Keyword】：empirical research, quality evaluation, second language acquisition |
| | | | | | 1 | 宋雪松,文旭; 二语习得中的概念整合模式 [A];第四届全国认知语言学研讨会论文摘要汇编 [C]; 2006年 | | 2 | 徐延飞; 利用网络学术调查系统进行学术调查 [A];全国大学英语教学改革暨网络环境下外语教学学术研讨会论文集 [C]; 2004年 | | 3 | 赵凌; 文化的标记性研究 [A];第六届中国跨文化交际研究会年会论文摘要汇编 [C]; 2005年 | | 4 | 王善平; 语言迁移之探讨 [A];福建省外国语文学会2004年会论文集 [C]; 2004年 |
|
|
|
