| | | | | 汉语立法语篇的言语行为分析 | | | 张新红 | | | 本文的研究对象是汉语法律语篇中的法律言语行为。法律言语行为指那些具有法律效力的言语行为,其主要功能是实现法律的规范调节功能。这种规范调节功能可以进一步划分成赋予权利类和规定义务两大类。本文还提出,可以根据其中施为动词的有无、施为用意的强弱把法律言语行为划分为显性、规约性和隐性三大类。文章首先简要地讨论了法律语言的一般语用原则、特点和与法律言语行为有关的理论,然后分析了法律言语行为的功能、分类,最后通过调查的方法调查和分析了法律言语行为在汉语立法语篇中的实施情况以及各类言语行为的分类和分布。
【作者单位】：广东外语外贸大学国际法学院 510420
【关键词】：法律语言;法律言语行为;赋予权利;规定义务;显性;规约性;隐性
【分类号】：D90-055
【DOI】：cnki:ISSN:1003-6105.0.2000-03-005
【正文快照】：
引言 提起法律语言,人们对它最深刻的印象就是其中复杂的法律术语和句法结构。事实上,作为法律义化载体的法律语言的复杂『生已经引起越来越多的语言学家和法律界专家的关注。他们从语言学、应用语言学、翻译研究、社会学、人类学、心理学、法学、修辞学等角度(如Conley&O’Ban"1990,1998:(hbbon~;1994;Bhatia 1983,1993,1994,1995:Sarcevic 1997:Solan 1993;White 1982等)对法律术语、法律语言的用词和用句特点和修辞特点、法律语言的简化问题、语言在法律和法律语篇中的作用等许多方面进行了卓有成效的研究,其研究成果丰富了人们对法律… | | |  推荐 CAJ下载  PDF下载 | | | CAJViewer7.0阅读器支持所有CNKI文件格式，AdobeReader仅支持PDF格式 | | | | An Analysis of the Speech Acts in Chinese Legislative Discourses | | | Zhang Xinhong
Faculty of International legal Studies Guangdong University of Foreign Studies Guangzhou 510421 P. R. China | | | The object of inquiry of the present study is the legal speech acts as realized in Chinese legal discourses. Legal speech acts are different from those used in everyday discourses in that they carry legal force. Their primary pragmatic function is to regulate the social behavior of citizens and the relationship between them. This regulative function can be further divided into two sub-functions: to confer rights and to impose obligations. Based upon previous studies on speech acts and legal speech acts by Austin (1962), Searle (1975), Habermas (1981) and Trosborg (1995), legal speech acts are classified into three types: explicit, conventionalized and implicit. Following this analytical framework, we conducted an investigation into the explicit and conventionalized legal speech acts as used in Chinese legislative discourses in terms of their functions, realization, distribution and frequency. The general pragmatic principles of forensic communication and the features of legal discourses are also discussed in this paper.
【Keyword】：language of the law, legal speech acts, explicit, conventionalized, implicit, to confer rights, to impose obligations/duties |
|
|
